4.7 Article

Is there a causal role for homocysteine concentration in blood pressure? A Mendelian randomization study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages 39-49

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.116038

Keywords

blood pressure; cohort studies; homocysteine; Mendelian randomization; molecular epidemiology

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. International Development Research Center (Canada)
  3. Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq)
  4. Rio Gran de do Sul State Research Support Foundation (FAPERGS)
  5. Brazilian Ministry of Health
  6. International Development Research Center
  7. WHO
  8. Overseas Development Administration
  9. European Union
  10. National Support Program for Centers of Excellence (PRONEX)
  11. CNPq
  12. FAPERGS
  13. MRC [MC_UU_12013/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: An understanding of whether homocysteine is a cause or a marker of increased blood pressure is relevant because blood homocysteine can be effectively lowered by safe and inexpensive interventions (e.g., vitamin B-6, B-9, and B-12 supplementation). Objective: The aim was to assess the causal influence of homocysteine on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) in adults with the use of Mendelian randomization (MR). Design: Data from the 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort (Brazil) were used. A total of 4297 subjects were evaluated in 2004-2005 (mean age: 22.8 y). The association of homocysteine concentration with SBP and DBP was assessed by conventional ordinary least-squares (OLS) linear regression and 2-stage least-squares (2SLS) regression (MR analysis). The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T (rs1801133) was used as proxy for homocysteine concentration. We also applied MR to data from the International Consortium for Blood Pressure (ICBP) genomewide association studies (>69,000 participants) using rs1801133 and additional homocysteine-associated SNPs as instruments. Results: In OLS regression, a 1-SD unit increase in log homocysteine concentration was associated with an increase of 0.9 (95% CI: 0.4, 1.4) mm Hg in SBP and of 1.0 (95% CI: 0.6, 1.4) mm Hg in DBP. In 2SLS regression, for the same increase in homocysteine, the coefficients were -1.8 mm Hg for SBP (95% CI: -3.9, 0.4 mm Hg; P = 0.01) and 0.1 mm Hg for DBP (95% CI: -1.5, 1.7 mm Hg; P = 0.24). In the MR analysis of ICBP data, homocysteine concentration was not associated with SBP (beta = 0.6 mm Hg for each 1-SD unit increase in log homocysteine; 95% CI: -0.8, 1.9 mm Hg) but was positively associated with DBP (beta = 1.1 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.2, 1.9 mm Hg). The association of genetically increased homocysteine with DBP was not consistent across different SNPs. Conclusion: Overall, the present findings do not corroborate the hypothesis that homocysteine has a causal role in blood pressure, especially in SBP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available