4.4 Review

Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3

Journal

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 551-576

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7

Keywords

Reading intervention; Response to intervention; RTI; Tier 2

Funding

  1. Institute of Education Sciences
  2. U.S. Department of Education [R324A130262]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P50 HD052117-01, P50 HD052117-07]
  4. NCSER
  5. IES [916012, 915827] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  6. NCSER
  7. IES [R324A130262] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis extends previous work on extensive Tier 3 type reading interventions (Wanzek and Vaughn School Psychology Review, 36, 541-561, 2007; Wanzek et al. Review of Educational Research, 83, 163-195, 2013) to Tier 2 type interventions by examining a non-overlapping set of studies addressing the effects of less extensive reading interventions for students with or at risk for reading difficulties in Grades K-3. We examined the overall effects of these interventions on students' foundational skills, language, and comprehension as well as the intervention features that may be associated with improved outcomes. We conducted four meta-analyses on 72 studies to examine effects on (1) standardized foundational skill measures (mean ES = 0.54), (2) not-standardized foundational skill measures (mean ES = 0.62), (3) standardized language/comprehension measures (mean ES = 0.36), and (4) not-standardized language/comprehension measures (mean ES = 1.02). There were no differences in effects related to intervention type, instructional group size, grade level, intervention implementer, or the number of intervention hours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available