4.7 Article

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of industrial pollution in China

Journal

CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 179-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.001

Keywords

Industrial economic; Industrial pollution; Spatiotemporal heterogeneity; GWR & GTWR; China

Categories

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [11ZD040, 11BKS045, 12CK5022]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CUGW160401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the lack of effective institutional constraints, the negative externality from industrial production will lead to environmental pollution and spatial spillover on neighboring units. Because the self-purification capacity of the environmental system is limited, a strong time effect is witnessed. Time lag and spatial spillover need to be considered to mitigate the effect of industrial pollution. Using geographically weighted regression (GWR) and geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR), this paper decomposes the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of industrial pollution in China. Results show a significant spatio-temporality in the evolution of the provincial-level industrial pollution since 2007. As the major participants, state-owned enterprises play a leading role in the state economy and greatly affect pollutant emissions. In the central and eastern regions, an increasing proportion of state-owned output values is related to the decrease of industrial pollution emissions, whereas western regions witness an opposite trend. Emissions charge plays a positive role in curbing the emission from industrial enterprises in the central and western regions. A better understanding of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of industrial pollution is the prerequisite in the alleviation of industrial pollutions to achieve a sustainable economic growth. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available