Journal
BIG DATA & SOCIETY
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 1-17Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2053951716664747
Keywords
Big Data; epistemology; software; complexity; error; Critical Data Studies
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We address some of the epistemological challenges highlighted by the Critical Data Studies literature by reference to some of the key debates in the philosophy of science concerning computational modeling and simulation. We provide a brief overview of these debates focusing particularly on what Paul Humphreys calls epistemic opacity. We argue that debates in Critical Data Studies and philosophy of science have neglected the problem of error management and error detection. This is an especially important feature of the epistemology of Big Data. In Error'' section we explain the main characteristics of error detection and correction along with the relationship between error and path complexity in software. In this section we provide an overview of conventional statistical methods for error detection and review their limitations when faced with the high degree of conditionality inherent to modern software systems.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available