4.5 Article

Laboratory and numerical study on an enhanced evaporation process in a loess soil column subjected to heating

Journal

JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 553-564

Publisher

ZHEJIANG UNIV
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A1600246

Keywords

Soil column; Heating; Evaporation; Water vapor diffusion; Thermo-hydraulic coupled model

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China [2012CB719800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378466, 51508504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The water vapor diffusion can be enhanced by the heating from municipal solid waste, and significantly impact the evaporation process in the earthen final cover. The parameters associated with the water vapor diffusion are usually measured by using the instantaneous profile method. This method is very time-consuming because the drying process lasts a long time. In this study, a bottom heating method is proposed to accelerate the drying process in a loess soil column. A constant temperature of 70 A degrees C is applied at the bottom of the soil column. The thermo-hydraulic response of the loess is monitored along the soil column. A numerical model is developed to simulate the coupled thermo-hydraulic process. The numerical model is used to back analyze the tortuosity tau of the loess for vapor diffusion and the parameter a of an empirical evaporation function. We found that the bottom heating accelerated the drying process of the soil column by almost 22 d compared with the conditions without heating under the same evaporation boundary. Before Day 15, the proportions of the enhanced vapor flux in the total water loss were higher than 50%, dominating the evaporation process. The experimental and numerical study demonstrated that the proposed heating method is able to obtain the parameters of vapor diffusion more efficiently than the conventional method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available