4.8 Article

Dithieno[3,2-b:2 ',3 '-d]pyrrol Fused Nonfullerene Acceptors Enabling Over 13% Efficiency for Organic Solar Cells

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201707150

Keywords

dithieno[3,2-b:2 ',3 '-d]pyrrol; high-performance organic solar cells; narrow bandgap; nonfullerene acceptors

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573077, 61675017]
  2. 333 Project to Cultivate High Level Talents in Jiangsu Province
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province
  4. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [BK20130032]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017YJS191]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new electron-rich central building block, 5,5,12,12-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)-indacenobis-(dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]pyrrol) (INP), and two derivative nonfullerene acceptors (INPIC and INPIC-4F) are designed and synthesized. The two molecules reveal broad (600-900 nm) and strong absorption due to the satisfactory electron-donating ability of INP. Compared with its counterpart INPIC, fluorinated nonfullerene acceptor INPIC-4F exhibits a stronger near-infrared absorption with a narrower optical bandgap of 1.39 eV, an improved crystallinity with higher electron mobility, and down-shifted highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy levels. Organic solar cells (OSCs) based on INPIC-4F exhibit a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.13% and a relatively low energy loss of 0.54 eV, which is among the highest efficiencies reported for binary OSCs in the literature. The results demonstrate the great potential of the new INP as an electron-donating building block for constructing high-performance nonfullerene acceptors for OSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available