4.7 Article

The social structure of heat consumption in Denmark: New interpretations from quantitative analysis

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 109-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.09.002

Keywords

Energy consumption; Practice theory; Regression analysis; Energy efficiency

Funding

  1. Innovation Fond, Denmark

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of households in relation to heat and energy consumption has been well-described in both quantitative and qualitative studies. However, where practice theory has developed as the main theoretical framework within qualitative studies on energy consumption, the more recent quantitative studies do not interpret the results within a sociological theoretical context. Consequently, the two approaches are not contributing their respective insights on how to understand energy consumption. In this paper, the methodology of the quantitative studies is combined with the theoretical perspectives of the qualitative studies, emphasising how energy consumption is a result of energy-consuming practices. Focusing on heat consumption used for space heating and heating of water in single-family detached houses in Denmark, it is found that sociocultural differences between households such as income, education, occupation, and immigration status influence the amount of heat consumed by a household; directly as an indicator of household practices and indirectly through type of building and household characteristics. New interpretations based on theories of practice show that factors such as the social structure of heat consumption, status of houses and unreflective practices are important for understanding the role of households in relation to heat consumption, and for forming policies for sustainable development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available