4.8 Article

Boosting Sodium Storage in TiO2 Nanotube Arrays through Surface Phosphorylation

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201704337

Keywords

sodium-ion batteries; sodium storage; surface functionalization; titanium dioxide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672182, 51422206, 51372159]
  2. 333 High-Level Talents Project in Jiangsu Province
  3. Thousand Young Talents Plan
  4. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20151219, BK20140009]
  5. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office
  8. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) offer a promise of a scalable, low-cost, and environmentally benign means of renewable energy storage. However, the low capacity and poor rate capability of anode materials present an unavoidable challenge. In this work, it is demonstrated that surface phosphorylated TiO2 nanotube arrays grown on Ti substrate can be efficient anode materials for SIBs. Fabrication of the phosphorylated nanoarray film is based on the electrochemical anodization of Ti metal in NH4F solution and subsequent phosphorylation using sodium hypophosphite. The phosphorylated TiO2 nanotube arrays afford a reversible capacity of 334 mA h g(-1) at 67 mA g(-1), a superior rate capability of 147 mA h g(-1) at 3350 mA g(-1), and a stable cycle performance up to 1000 cycles. In situ X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy reveal the near-zero strain response and robust mechanical behavior of the TiO2 host upon (de)sodiation, suggesting its excellent structural stability in the Na+ storage application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available