4.8 Article

Exploring Critical Factors Affecting Strain Distribution in 1D Silicon-Based Nanostructures for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705430

Keywords

anodes; lithium-ion batteries; nanowires; silicon; strain

Funding

  1. Samsung Research Funding & Incubation Center of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (A Rapid Charging Battery and its Prototype Cells Retaining High Energy Density) [SRFC-TA1603-01]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through NRF Korea [NRF-2017R1A4A1015323]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A4A1015323] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the advantage of high capacity, the practical use of the silicon anode is still hindered by large volume expansion during the severe pulverization lithiation process, which results in electrical contact loss and rapid capacity fading. Here, a combined electrochemical and computational study on the factor for accommodating volume expansion of silicon-based anodes is shown. 1D silicon-based nanostructures with different internal spaces to explore the effect of spatial ratio of voids and their distribution degree inside the fibers on structural stability are designed. Notably, lotus-root-type silicon nanowires with locally distributed void spaces can improve capacity retention and structural integrity with minimum silicon pulverization during lithium insertion and extraction. The findings of this study indicate that the distribution of buffer spaces, electrochemical surface area, as well as Li diffusion property significantly influence cycle performance and rate capability of the battery, which can be extended to other silicon-based anodes to overcome large volume expansion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available