4.8 Article

Nonfullerene Tandem Organic Solar Cells with High Performance of 14.11%

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201707508

Keywords

high efficiency; nonfullerene acceptors; tandem organic solar cells

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201607020010]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MoST) [2014CB643502]
  3. 111 Project [B12015]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) of China [91633301, 51773095]
  5. Tianjin city [17JCZDJC31100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fabricating solar cells with tandem structure is an efficient way to broaden the photon response range without further increasing the thermalization loss in the system. In this work, a tandem organic solar cell (TOSC) based on highly efficient nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) with series connection type is demonstrated. To meet the different demands of front and rear sub-cells, two NFAs named F-M and NOBDT with a whole absorption range from 300 to 900 nm are designed, when blended with wide bandgap polymer poly[(2,6-(4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene))-alt-(5,5-(1',3'-di-2-thienyl-5',7'-bis(2-ethylhexyl)benzo[1',2'-c:4',5'-c']dithiophene-4,8-dione))] (PBDB-T) and narrow bandgap polymer PTB7-Th, respectively, the PBDB-T: F-M system exhibits a high V-oc of 0.98 V and the PTB7-Th: NOBDT system shows a remarkable J(sc) of 19.16 mA cm(-2), which demonstrate their potential in the TOSCs. With the guidance of optical simulation, by systematically optimizing the thickness of each layer in the TOSC, an outstanding power conversion efficiency of 14.11%, with a V-oc of 1.71 V, a J(sc) of 11.72 mA cm(-2), and a satisfactory fill factor of 0.70 is achieved; this result is one of the top efficiencies reported to date in the field of organic solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available