4.8 Article

Fabrication of Nickel-Cobalt Bimetal Phosphide Nanocages for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Catalysis

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201706008

Keywords

bimetal phosphide; charge transfer; electrocatalysis; nanocages; oxygen evolution reaction

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030313279]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YW2A, 1-ZVGH, 1-ZVK1]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51607102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replacement of precious metals with earth-abundant electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) holds great promise for realizing practically viable water-splitting systems. It still remains a great challenge to develop low-cost, highly efficient, and durable OER catalysts. Here, the composition and morphology of Ni-Co bimetal phosphide nanocages are engineered for a highly efficient and durable OER electrocatalyst. The nanocage structure enlarges the effective specific area and facilitates the contact between catalyst and electrolyte. The as-prepared Ni-Co bimetal phosphide nanocages show superior OER performance compared with Ni2P and CoP nanocages. By controlling the molar ratio of Ni/Co atoms in Ni-Co bimetal hydroxides, the Ni0.6Co1.4P nanocages derived from Ni0.6Co1.4(OH)(2) nanocages exhibit remarkable OER catalytic activity (eta = 300 mV at 10 mA cm(-2)) and long-term stability (10 h for continuous test). The density-functional-theory calculations suggest that the appropriate Co doping concentration increases density of states at the Fermi level and makes the d-states more close to Fermi level, giving rise to high charge carrier density and low intermedia adsorption energy than those of Ni2P and CoP. This work also provides a general approach to optimize the catalysis performance of bimetal compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available