4.8 Review

Development and Challenges of Functional Electrolytes for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 38, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201800919

Keywords

electrolytes; hybrid electrolytes; liquid electrolytes; lithium-sulfur batteries; solid electrolytes

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China New Energy Project for Electric Vehicle [2016YFB0100204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772030, U1564206]
  3. Major achievements Transformation Project for Central University in Beijing
  4. Beijing Science and Technology Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, as one of the most important candidates of next-generation batteries, are famous for high energy density, low cost, and environmental friendly benignity. However, issues originating from polysulfide shuttle of common liquid electrolytes (e.g., capacity fade, poor cycle life, and safe issue) have hindered the applications of Li-S batteries in various occasions. This review summarizes the main efforts in the electrolytes of Li-S batteries, including liquid, solid state, and hybrid electrolyte systems. The development of functional electrolytes for Li-S batteries is hopeful to alleviate the problems Li-S batteries faced today. The liquid electrolytes circumvent the polysulfide shuttle and the resultant problems by utilizing different functional solvents, lithium salts, and additives. Solid-state electrolytes as promising electrolytes are optimized to enhance the ionic conductivity at room temperature and decrease the interfacial resistance. Hybrid electrolytes that consist of two or more single electrolytes may be considered as unique categories because they have the potential advantages than the single electrolyte systems. Challenges and perspectives of Li-S electrolytes are also proposed based on the requirement for high-performance Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available