4.8 Article

Identifying Active Sites of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Materials for the CO2 Reduction Reaction

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201800499

Keywords

active sites; carbon dioxide reduction; carbon monoxide; electrocatalysts; nitrogen-doped graphene

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0600902]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB17020400]
  3. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund (AcRF) [RG111/15, RG10/16, MOE2016-T2-2-004]
  4. Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (A*Star) [M4070232.120]
  5. National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen-doped carbon materials are proposed as promising electrocatalysts for the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CRR), which is essential for renewable energy conversion and environmental remediation. Unfortunately, the unclear cognition on the CRR active site (or sites) hinders further development of high-performance electrocatalysts. Herein, a series of 3D nitrogen-doped graphene nanoribbon networks (N-GRW) with tunable nitrogen dopants are designed to unravel the site-dependent CRR activity/selectivity. The N-GRW catalyst exhibits superior CO2 electrochemical reduction activity, reaching a specific current of 15.4 A g(catalyst)(-1) with CO Faradaic efficiency of 87.6% at a mild overpotential of 0.49 V. Based on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements, it is experimentally demonstrated that the pyridinic N site in N-GRW serves as the active site for CRR. In addition, the Gibbs free energy calculated by density functional theory further illustrates the pyridinic N as a more favorable site for the CO2 adsorption, *COOH formation, and *CO removal in CO2 reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available