4.0 Article

The effect of temperature on proliferation and differentiation of chicken skeletal muscle satellite cells isolated from different muscle types

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12770

Keywords

Chicken; fiber type; muscle; satellite cells; temperature

Categories

Funding

  1. BARD [IS-4592-13]
  2. United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skeletal muscle satellite cells are a muscle stem cell population that mediate posthatch muscle growth and repair. Satellite cells respond differentially to environmental stimuli based upon their fiber-type of origin. The objective of this study was to determine how temperatures below and above the in vitro control of 38 degrees C affected the proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells isolated from the chicken anaerobic pectoralis major (p. major) or mixed fiber biceps femoris (b.femoris) muscles. The satellite cells isolated from the p. major muscle were more sensitive to both cold and hot temperatures compared to the b.femoris satellite cells during both proliferation and differentiation. The expressions of myogenic regulatory transcription factors were also different between satellite cells from different fiber types. MyoD expression, which partially regulates proliferation, was generally expressed at higher levels in p. major satellite cells compared to the b.femoris satellite cells from 33 to 43 degrees C during proliferation and differentiation. Similarly, myogenin expression, which is required for differentiation, was also expressed at higher levels in p. major satellite cells in response to both cold and hot temperatures during proliferation and differentiation than b.femoris satellite cells. These data demonstrate that satellite cells from the anaerobic p. major muscle are more sensitive than satellite cells from the aerobic b.femoris muscle to both hot and cold thermal stress during myogenic proliferation and differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available