4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Strategic design of extracellular vesicle drug delivery systems

Journal

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 12-16

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.017

Keywords

Drug delivery; Extracellular vesicles; Exosomes; Microvesicles; Liposomes

Funding

  1. Arthritis Research U.K. Foundation [21138]
  2. UK Regenerative Medicine Platform Acellular Approaches for Therapeutic Delivery [MR/K026682/1]
  3. State of the Art Biomaterials Development and Characterization of the Cell-Biomaterial Interface grant from the MRC [MR/L012677/1]
  4. ERC Seventh Framework Programme Consolidator grant Naturale CG [616417]
  5. Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award [098411/Z/12/Z]
  6. GlaxoSmithKline through the Imperial College London Engineered Medicines Laboratory Project
  7. MRC [MR/K026682/1, MR/L012677/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), sub-micron vectors used in intercellular communication, have demonstrated great promise as natural drug delivery systems. Recent reports have detailed impressive in vivo results from the administration of EVs pre-loaded with therapeutic cargo, including small molecules, nanoparticles, proteins and oligonucleotides. These results have sparked intensive research interest across a huge range of disease models. There are, however, enduring limitations that have restricted widespread clinical and pharmaceutical adoption. In this perspective, we discuss these practical and biological concerns, critically compare the relative merit of EVs and synthetic drug delivery systems, and highlight the need for a more comprehensive understanding of in vivo transport and delivery. Within this framework, we seek to establish key areas in which EVs can gain a competitive advantage in order to provide the tangible added value required for widespread translation. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available