4.5 Article

Initial severity of major depression and efficacy of new generation antidepressants: individual participant data meta-analysis

Journal

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages 450-458

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12886

Keywords

depression; antidepressives; meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP17dk0307072, JP17 dm0107093]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293347, 16K15565, 17K19808, 17H04324, 16H06276] Funding Source: KAKEN
  3. MRC [MC_PC_17215] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The role of baseline severity as effect modifier in various psychiatric disorders is a topic of controversy and of clinical import. This study aims to examine whether baseline severity modifies the efficacy of various antidepressants for major depression through individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Method: We identified all placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trials of new generation antidepressants in the acute phase treatment of major depression conducted in Japan and requested their IPD through the public-private partnerships (PPPs) between the relevant academic societies and the pharmaceutical companies. The effect modification by baseline depression severity was examined through six increasingly complex competing mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Results: We identified eleven eligible trials and obtained IPD from six, which compared duloxetine, escitalopram, mirtazapine, paroxetine or bupropion against placebo (total n = 2464). The best-fitting model revealed that the interaction between baseline severity and treatment was not statistically significant (coefficient = -0.04, 95% confidence interval: -0.16 to 0.08, P = 0.49). Several sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings. Conclusion: We may expect as much benefit from antidepressant treatments for mild, moderate or severe major depression. Clinical practice guidelines will need to take these findings into consideration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available