4.4 Article

Wave height estimation using the singular peaks in the sea echoes of high frequency radar

Journal

ACTA OCEANOLOGICA SINICA
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 108-114

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13131-018-1161-0

Keywords

high frequency radar; wave height; Bragg peak; singular peak; ocean state monitoring and analyzing radar

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61371198]
  2. National Special Program for Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development of China [2013YQ160793]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The popular methods to estimate wave height with high-frequency (HF) radar depend on the integration over the second-order spectral region and thus may come under from even not strong external interference. To improve the accuracy and increase the valid detection range of the wave height measurement, particularly by the smallaperture radar, it is turned to singular peaks which often exceed the power of other frequency components. The power of three kinds of singular peaks, i.e., those around +/- 1, +/- and +/- times the Bragg frequency, are retrieved from a one-month-long radar data set collected by an ocean state monitoring and analyzing radar, model S (OSMAR-S), and in situ buoy records are used to make some comparisons. The power response to a wave height is found to be described with a new model quite well, by which obvious improvement on the wave height estimation is achieved. With the buoy measurements as reference, a correlation coefficient is increased to 0.90 and a root mean square error (RMSE) is decreased to 0.35 m at the range of 7.5 km compared with the results by the second-order method. The further analysis of the fitting performance across range suggests that the peak has the best fit and maintains a good performance as far as 40 km. The correlation coefficient is 0.78 and the RMSE is 0.62 m at 40 km. These results show the effectiveness of the new empirical method, which opens a new way for the wave height estimation with the HF radar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available