4.3 Article

Neurofilament light protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid predict long-term disability of Guillain-Barre syndrome: A pilot study

Journal

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages 143-150

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12927

Keywords

biomarker; cerebrospinal fluid; glial fibrillary acidic protein; Guillain-Barre syndrome; neurofilament light protein; prognosis

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. European Research Council
  3. Torsten Soderberg Foundation
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. Swedish Society of the Neurologically Disabled
  6. Edit Jacobson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Although the recovery from Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is good in most patients, some develop permanent severe disability or even die. Early predictors would increase the likelihood to identify patients at risk for poor outcome at the acute stage, allowing them intensified therapeutic intervention. Materials and Method: Eighteen patients with a history of GBS 9-17 years ago were reassessed with scoring of neurological disability and quality of life assessment (QoL). Their previous diagnostic work-up included clinical examination with scoring of disability, neurophysiological investigation, a battery of serology tests for infections, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination. Aliquots of CSF were frozen, stored for 20-28 years, and analyzed by ELISA for determination of neurofilament light protein (NFL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Results: Patients with poor outcome (n = 3) had significantly higher NFL and GFAP levels at GBS nadir than those with good outcome (n = 15, P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). High NFL correlated with more prominent disability and worse QoL at long-term follow-up (r = .694, P < .001, and SF 36 dimension physical component summary (PCS) (r = -.65, P < .05), respectively, whereas GFAP did not correlate with clinical outcome or QoL. Conclusion: High NFL in CSF at the acute stage of GBS seems to predict long-term outcome and might, together with neurophysiological and clinical measures, be useful in treatment decisions and clinical care of GBS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available