4.5 Article

New insights into receptor-like protein functions in Arabidopsis

Journal

PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1197469

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; overexpression; redundancy; receptor-like protein; transcriptional profiling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271575, 31200902]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201103005]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education from the Ministry of Education of China [20120202120009]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry
  5. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2014JM3064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Receptor-like proteins (RLPs) are implicated in plant development and immunity. Genome-wide sequence analysis identified fifty-seven RLPs in Arabidopsis. However, only a few AtRLPs have been functionally characterized. The major problems in determing the biological roles for AtRLP genes are the lack of suitable screening conditions and the high-degree of functional redundancy. In order to unravel the functions of AtRLP genes, recently we undertook a systematically functional analysis of AtRLP genes using transcriptional profiling and overexpression. Our findings indicate that most AtRLP genes are differentially expressed upon various conditions, and the expression of single AtRLP gene is often perturbed by multiple stimuli. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtRLP genes were generated. Our study presents an overview of biological processes in which AtRLP genes possibly are involved, and provides a valuable resource for further investigations into the biological roles of AtRLP genes. In this article, we elaborate our findings and propose further strategies concerning the function of unknown AtRLP genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available