4.7 Article

Five-parameter intervariant boundary characterization of martensite in commercially pure titanium

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 147-160

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.023

Keywords

Pure titanium; Martensite transformation; Crystallography; Variant selection; Intervariant boundary plane character distribution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intervariant boundary characteristics of a commercially pure Ti microstructure formed by the beta ->alpha martensitic phase transformation were described according to the crystallography of the displacive transformation and the boundary plane orientation. The martensitic transformation created a microstructure whose grain boundary misorientation angle distribution had four distinct peaks that were consistent with the misorientations between the variants produced by the Burgers orientation relationship. Interestingly, about 60% of population corresponded to 60 degrees/[11 (2) over bar0] intervariant boundaries. Three-variant clusters with a triangular morphology were observed frequently. This configuration is consistent with the phenomenological theory of martensite, which predicts that these clusters, separated by 60 degrees/[11 (2) over bar0] boundaries, have a lower transformation strain than other possible variant cluster arrangements. Other intervariant boundaries resulted from the impingement of different combinations of distinct three-variant clusters. The five-parameter boundary analysis revealed a strong anisotropy in the plane orientation distribution, showing that boundaries have a tendency to terminate on prismatic {hki0} and pyramidal {10 (1) over bar1} planes, when misorientation was ignored. The dominant 60 degrees/[11 (2) over bar0] intervariant boundaries had symmetric tilt ((1) over bar 101) boundary planes, which are a low energy configuration. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available