4.7 Article

Re segregation at interfacial dislocation network in a nickel-based superalloy

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 137-146

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.025

Keywords

Ni-based single crystal superalloys; Rhenium-effect; Interface segregation; Interfacial dislocation network; In situ tension test

Funding

  1. Chinese 1000-Youth-Talent Plan
  2. 111 project [B16042]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671168, 11327901]
  4. State Key Program for Basic Research in China [2015CB65930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of Rhenium (Re) in a Ni-based single-crystal superalloy is studied by sub-angstrom resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). It is found that Re atoms segregate at the tensile stress regions near the interfacial dislocation cores, forming the Cottrell atmosphere, and the segregation process is facilitated by dislocation pipe diffusion. In situ TEM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) straining studies reveal that the Re-decorated dislocation networks along the phase boundaries act as mechanical walls that effectively block dislocation motion and crack propagation. Furthermore, the degree of Re segregation can be regulated by thermal treatment. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that this remarkable alloying effect originated mainly from the interactions between the local composition strain of Re and the dislocation strains, leading to significantly stabilized interfacial dislocation networks. These results provide a new perspective on understanding the origin of the Re effect on mechanical properties in Ni-based super alloys and will be beneficial to both improving creep properties of Ni-based superalloys and designing high-performance Re-free superalloys. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available