4.7 Article

Insights into the stress corrosion cracking of solution annealed alloy 690 in simulated pressurized water reactor primary water under dynamic straining

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 321-333

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.002

Keywords

Nickel alloy; STEM; Grain boundary diffusion; Stress-corrosion cracking; Grain boundary migration

Funding

  1. DOE I-NERI program [2011-01-K]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy under DOE Idaho Operations Office as part of a Nuclear Science User Facilities experiment [DE-AC07-051D14517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intergranular attack near both stagnant and active stress corrosion crack (SCC) tips of solution annealed alloy 690 were characterized after constant extension rate tensile tests in simulated pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water containing 18cc H-2/kg H2O. In both cracks, an intergranular oxide, composed of NiO and Cr2O3, was observed beyond the crack tip with an adjacent Cr depleted grain boundary migration zone. The stagnant crack has a compact Cr2O3 covering the crack tip and the adjacent grain boundary migration zone is deep and free of oxidation, while the active crack has porous penetrative oxide extending into the migration zone. The ability to form a compact Cr2O3 film at the crack tip is important to the IGSCC resistance and may be dictated by the efficiency of Cr diffusion up the migrated grain boundary. When a compact Cr2O3 film does not form at the crack tip, the Cr depleted grain boundary migration zone is subject to penetrative oxidation via the inward diffusion of oxygen, making the zone susceptible to crack propagation. Thus, even a high Cr content cannot guarantee the immunity of a Ni base alloy to SCC during dynamic straining. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available