4.7 Article

Secondary twin variant selection in four types of double twins in titanium

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 58-76

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.068

Keywords

Titanium; Double twin; Secondary twin; Variant selection

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-1661686]
  2. NSF [CMMI-1462885]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We experimentally characterized four types of double twins in pure titanium and discussed the selection of secondary twin variants based on the apparent Schmid factor (a-SF), the displacement gradient accommodation (DGA), the modified DGA (m-DGA), and the nucleation via dislocation dissociation (NDD). The four types of double twins are classified into two families according to their zone axes: co-family double twins and non-family double twins. Co-family double twins share the zone axis <10<(1)over bar>0>. Non family double twins have different zone axes with one along <11<(2)over bar>0> and the other along <10<(1)over bar>0>. Experimental observations reveal that the co-family double twins have one secondary twin variant prevailed over others and the non-family double twins have two secondary twin variants preferred than others. The a-SFs associated with secondary twins are always positive once the primary twin is activated, thus predicting no obvious preference for the selection of secondary twin variants. The m-DGA and NDD correctly predict the selection of secondary twin variants, implying that the preferred secondary twin variant would, to the greatest extent, relax plastic deformation associated with the primary twinning and the nucleation of the secondary twin variant is facilitated by the accumulation of available gliding dislocations at the primary twin boundary. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available