4.1 Article

Sex Differences in Monoamines Following Amphetamine and Social Reward in Adolescent Rats

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 197-205

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/pha0000026

Keywords

amphetamine; monoamines; social interaction; adolescents; sex differences

Funding

  1. NIH [P50 DA05312, R01 DA012964, T32 DA016176, T32 DA035200, F32 DA036291]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA012964, T32DA035200, F32DA036291, P50DA005312, T32DA016176] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interaction with social peers may increase rates of drug self-administration, but a recent study from our laboratory showed that social interaction may serve as a type of alternative reward that competes with drug taking in adolescent male rats. Based on those previous results, the current study examined sex differences in preference for social interaction compared with amphetamine (AMPH) in adolescent rats using the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. Similar to previous results with males, females showed AMPH CPP regardless of whether they were individual-or pair-housed. In contrast to males, however, females failed to show social CPP, and they did not prefer a peer-associated compartment over an AMPH-associated compartment in a free-choice test. In separate experiments, dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) metabolite levels were measured in adolescent males and females that were exposed acutely to peer interaction, no peer interaction, AMPH, or saline. In amygdala, levels of the DA metabolite dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) were altered more in response to peer interaction in males than females; in contrast, there was a greater amygdala DOPAC response to AMPH in females. Furthermore, there were greater changes in the 5-HT metabolite hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in females than in males following social interaction. These results indicate that the ability of peer interactions to reduce drug reward is greater in adolescent males than females, perhaps due to a greater ability of social cues to activate limbic reward mechanisms in males or a greater ability of AMPH cues to activate limbic reward mechanisms in females.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available