4.8 Article

Synthesis and evaluation of dual crosslinked alginate microbeads

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 53-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.046

Keywords

Alginate; Microbeads; Methacrylated alginate; Inflammation; Omentum

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5R01EB020604]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-1263994, IIS-1125412, 1614365, EEC 1461215]
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs [5 I01 BX000418-06, 1 IK2 RX002305-01A2]
  4. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPG3C1062]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST)
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB020604] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. Veterans Affairs [I01BX000418, IK2RX002305] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alginate hydrogels have been investigated for a broad variety of medical applications. The ability to assemble hydrogels at neutral pH and mild temperatures makes alginate a popular choice for the encapsulation and delivery of cells and proteins. Alginate has been studied extensively for the delivery of islets as a treatment for type 1 diabetes. However, poor stability of the encapsulation systems after implantation remains a challenge. In this paper, alginate was modified with 2-aminoethyl methacrylate hydrochloride (AEMA) to introduce groups that can be photoactivated to generate covalent bonds. This enabled formation of dual crosslinked structure upon exposure to ultraviolet light following initial ionic crosslinking into bead structures. The degree of methacrylation was varied and in vitro stability, long term swelling, and cell viability examined. At low levels of the methacrylation, the beads could be formed by first ionic crosslinks followed by exposure to ultraviolet light to generate covalent bonds. The methacrylated alginate resulted in more stable beads and cells were viable following encapsulation. Alginate microbeads, ionic (unmodified) and dual crosslinked, were implanted into a rat omentum pouch model. Implantation was performed with a local injection of 100 mu l of 50 mu g/m1 of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to stimulate a robust inflammatory challenge in vivo. Implants were retrieved at 1 and 3 weeks for analysis. The unmodified alginate microbeads had all failed by week 1, whereas the dual-crosslinked alginate microbeads remained stable up through 3 weeks. The modified alginate microbeads may provide a more stable alternative to current alginate-based systems for cell encapsulation. (c) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available