4.0 Article

Characteristics and distributions of atmospheric mercury emitted from anthropogenic sources in Guiyang, southwestern China

Journal

ACTA GEOCHIMICA
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 240-250

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11631-016-0111-9

Keywords

Atmospheric mercury; Speciation; Anthropogenic sources; GEM; PHg; RGM

Funding

  1. U.S. National Research Council Associateship Award at U.S. EPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40773067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continuous measurements of speciated atmospheric mercury (Hg), including gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), particulate mercury (PHg), and reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) were conducted in Guizhou Province, southwestern China. Guiyang Power Plant (GPP), Guiyang Wujiang Cement Plant, Guizhou Aluminum Plant (GAP), and Guiyang Forest Park (GFP) in Guiyang were selected as study sites. Automatic Atmospheric Mercury Speciation Analyzers (Tekran 2537A) were used for GEM analysis. PHg and RGM were simultaneously collected by a manual sampling system, including elutriator, coupler/impactor, KCl-coated annular denuder, and a filter holder. Results show that different emission sources dominate different species of Hg. The highest average GEM value was 22.2 +/- 28.3 ng.m(-3) and the lowest 6.1 +/- 3.9 ng.m(-3), from samples collected at GPP and GAP, respectively. The maximum average PHg was 1984.9 pg.m(-3) and the minimum average 55.9 pg.m(-3), also from GPP and GAP, respectively. Similarly, the highest average RGM of 68.8 pg.m(-3) was measured at GPP, and the lowest level of 20.5 pg.m(-3) was found at GAP. We conclude that coal combustion sources are still playing a key role in GEM; traffic contributes significantly to PHg; and domestic pollution dominates RGM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available