4.8 Article

Ordered Topographically Patterned Silicon by Insect-Inspired Capillary Submicron Stamping

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 7451-7458

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b18163

Keywords

insect-inspired capillary submicron stamping; surface-limited metal-assisted chemical etching; topographically patterned silicon

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [INST 190/164-1 FUGG]
  2. European Research Council [646742 INCANA, ERC-CoG-2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insect-inspired capillary submicron stamping and subsequent surface-limited metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) with ammonium bifluoride as a HF source are employed for the high-throughput production of ordered topographically patterned silicon (tpSi). Insect feet often possess hairy contact elements through which adhesive secretion is deployed. Thus, arrays of adhesive secretion drops remain as footprints on contact surfaces. Stamps for insect-inspired capillary submicron stamping having surfaces topographically patterned with contact elements mimic the functional principles of such insect feet. They contain spongy continuous nanopore networks penetrating the entire stamps. Any ink (organic or aqueous) may be supplied from the backside of the nanoporous stamps to the contact elements. We generated ordered arrays of submicron AgNO3 dots extending square millimeters on Si by manual stamping with cycle times of a few seconds under ambient conditions; at higher load, ordered holey AgNO3 films were obtained. Surface-limited MACE correspondingly yielded either macroporous tpSi or Si pillar arrays. Inkjet printing of polymer solutions onto the tpSi yielded patterns of polymer blots conformally covering the tpSi. Such blot patterns could potentially represent a starting point for the development of persistent and scratch-resistant identity labels or quick response codes on silicon surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available