4.8 Article

Neuroprotective Effect of Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures in a Cell Model of Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 28, Pages 23682-23692

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b07827

Keywords

tetrahedral DNA nanostructures; nanomaterials; Alzheimer's disease; PC12 cells; A beta 25-35

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81671031, 81470721]
  2. Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team [2014TD0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accumulating evidence supports the abnormal deposition of amyloid beta-peptide (A beta) as the main cause of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore, fighting against the formation, deposition, and toxicity of A beta is a basic strategy for the treatment of AD. In the process of in vitro nerve cell culture, screening out drugs that can antagonize a series of toxic reactions caused by beta-amyloid deposition has become an effective method for the follow-up treatment of AD. Our previous studies showed that tetrahedral DNA nanostructures (TDNs) had good biocompatibility and had some positive effects on the biological behavior of cells. In this study, the main aim of our work was to explore the effects and potential mechanism of TDNs in protecting neuronal PC12 cells from the toxicity of A beta. Our study demonstrated that TDNs can protect and rescue PC12 cell death through A beta 25-35-induced PC12 cell apoptosis. Further studies showed that TDNs significantly improved the apoptosis by affecting the abnormal cell cycle, restoring abnormal nuclear morphology and caspase activity. Western blot analysis showed that TDNs could prevent the damage caused by A beta deposition by activating the ERK1/2 pathway and thus be a potential therapeutic agent with a neuroprotective effect in Alzheimer's disease. Our finding provides a potential application of TDNs in the prevention and treatment of AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available