4.8 Article

Novel Carbon Paper@Magnesium Silicate Composite Porous Films: Design, Fabrication, and Adsorption Behavior for Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Solution

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 26, Pages 22776-22785

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b01557

Keywords

porous composite film; magnesium silicate; adsorption behavior; heavy metal ions; adsorption-filtration

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0301600]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is of great and increasing interest to explore porous adsorption films to reduce heavy metal ions in aqueous solution. Here, we for the first time fabricated carbon paper@magnesium silicate (CP@MS) composite films for the high-efficiency removal of Zn2+ and Cu2+ by a solid-phase transformation from hydromagnesite-coated CP (CP@ MCH) precursor film in a hydrothermal route and detailedly examined adsorption process for Zn2+ and Cu2+ as well as the adsorption mechanism. The suitable initial pH range is beyond 4.0 for the adsorption of the CP@MS to remove Zn2+ under the investigated conditions, and the adsorption capacity is mainly up to the pore size of the porous film. The composite film exhibits excellent adsorption capacity for both of Zn2+ and Cu2+ with the corresponding maximum adsorption quantity of 198.0 mg g(-1) for Zn2+ and 113.5 mg g(-1) for Cu2+, which are advantageous over most of those reported in the literature. Furthermore, the adsorption behavior of the CP@MS film follows the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Langmuir adsorption equation for Zn2+ with the cation-exchange mechanism. Particularly, the CP@MS film shows promising practical applications for the removal of heavy metal ions in water by an adsorption-filtration system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available