4.8 Article

Comparison of Biological Responses of Polymers Based on Imine and Disulfide Backbones for siRNA Delivery

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 5196-5202

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b16101

Keywords

gene delivery; polycationic nucleic acid carrier; biologically degradable linkage; imine linkage; disulfide linkage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81570992, 81571261, 81602099]
  2. Science and Technology Development Foundation of Shanghai [17401901000]
  3. SUMHS seed foundation project [HMSF-16-21-010]
  4. Science and Technology Development Foundation of Pudong New District, Shanghai, China [PKJ2016-Y55, PWZxq2017-03]
  5. National Science and Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Development [2017ZX09101005-008-002]
  6. Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [YG2015MS06, YG2017MS22, YG2015QN12, YG2017QN56, YG2016QN22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To achieve a successful delivery of siRNA by carriers in vivo, the degradation of polymers in response to tiny intracellular changes should be seriously considered. In addition, the balance between degradation and stability of polymers is another key point for high performance of carriers. In this study, imine and disulfide linkages, which are sensitive to pH changes and redox environment, respectively, were constructed as the main backbone of polymers to deliver siRNA at the intracellular and animal level. Comparisons were made between performances of these two different polymers. Both of the polymers synthesized here have good ability to condense siRNA. However, polyplexes formed by the imine backbone-based polymer (TPSP) showed a larger particle size and a higher zeta potential than that of the disulfide backbone-based polymer (DTDPS). Although both TPSP and DTDPS could deliver the target siRNA into 7721 cells, polyplexes formed by TPSP showed a higher silence efficiency in vitro and accomplished more accumulation in tumors. In conclusion, we believe TPSP is superior to be used for siRNA delivery and promises a potential for widespread use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available