4.8 Article

Stabilization of Lithium-Metal Batteries Based on the in Situ Formation of a Stable Solid Electrolyte Interphase Layer

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 21, Pages 17985-17993

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b04592

Keywords

Li-metal battery; high-energy density; NCM 622; fluoroethylene carbonate; LiF-rich SEI layer

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korea government Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST) [NRF-2018R1A2B3008794]
  2. Human Resources Development programme of a Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of the Korean government [20154010200840]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium (Li) metals have been considered most promising candidates as an anode to increase the energy density of Li-ion batteries because of their ultrahigh specific capacity (3860 mA h g(-1)) and lowest redox potential (-3.040 V vs standard hydrogen electrode). However, unstable dendritic electrodeposition, low Coulombic efficiency, and infinite volume changes severely hinder their practical uses. Herein, we report that ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC)- and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC)-based electrolytes significantly enhance the energy density and cycling stability of Li-metal batteries (LMBs). In LMBs, using commercialized Ni-rich Li[Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2]O-2 (NCM622) and 1 M LiPF6 in EMC/FEC = 3:1 electrolyte exhibits a high initial capacity of 1.8 mA h cm(-2) with superior cycling stability and high Coulombic efficiency above 99.8% for 500 cycles while delivering a unprecedented energy density. The present work also highlights a significant improvement in scaled-up pouch-type Li/NCM622 cells. Moreover, the postmortem characterization of the cycled cathodes, separators, and Li-metal anodes collected from the pouch-type Li/NCM622 cells helped identifying the improvement or degradation mechanisms behind the observed electrochemical cycling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available