4.8 Article

Optimization of the Pore Structure of Biomass-Based Carbons in Relation to Their Use for CO2 Capture under Low- and High-Pressure Regimes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 1623-1633

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b10433

Keywords

carbon capture; porosity; adsorption; melamine; pressure; activated carbon

Funding

  1. FICYT [GRUPIN14-102]
  2. Spanish MINECO-FEDER [CTQ2015-63552-R]
  3. government of Iraq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A versatile chemical activation approach for the fabrication of sustainable porous carbons with a pore network tunable from micro- to hierarchical micro-/mesoporous is hereby presented. It is based on the use of a less corrosive and less toxic chemical, i.e., potassium oxalate, rather than the widely used KOH. The fabrication procedure is exemplified for glucose as precursor, although it can be extended to other biomass derivatives (saccharides) with similar results. When potassium oxalate alone is used as activating agent, highly microporous carbons are obtained (S-BET approximate to 1300-1700 m(2) g(-1)). When a melamine-mediated activation process is used, hierarchical micro-/mesoporous carbons with surface areas as large as 3500 m(2) g(-1) are obtained. The microporous carbons are excellent adsorbents for CO2 capture at low pressure and room temperature, able to adsorb 4.2-4.5 mmol CO2 g(-1) at 1 bar and 1.1-1.4 mmol CO2 g(-1) at 0.15 bar. However, the micro-/mesoporous carbons provide record-high room temperature CO2 uptakes at 30 bar of 32-33 mmol g(-1) CO2 and 44-49 mmol g(-1) CO2 at 50 bar. The findings demonstrate the key relevance of pore size in CO2 capture, with narrow micropores having the leading role at pressures <1 bar and supermicropores/small mesopores at high pressures. In this regard, the fabrication strategy presented here allows fine-tuning of the pore network to maximize both the overall CO2 uptake and the working capacity at any target pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available