3.8 Article

Crime prevention through urban design and planning in the smart city era The challenge of disseminating CP-UDP in Italy: learning from Europe

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLACE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 137-152

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JPMD-09-2015-0037

Keywords

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design CPTED); Crime Prevention through Urban Design and Planning CP-UDP); E-participation; Smart cities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyse the nexus between Crime Prevention through Urban Design and Planning (CP-UDP) and e-participation in urban planning, with the idea that a comprehensive planning approach is needed in order to have effective safe cities. Design/methodology/approach - This study relies on some European case studies on CP-UDP learned by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (EU COST) Action TU1203 and on a personal research experience focused on CPTED and its potential development in Italy - which was based on literature review and interviews with key informants. Findings - CP-UDP, as a proactive and potentially effective crime prevention strategy plays an important role in order to implement safer cities. Information and communications technology (ICT) can provide a valuable tool to enhance participatory planning. The thesis supported in this paper is that through the widespread of e-participation in urban planning is possible to implement safer cities if a comprehensive planning approach is applied and Italy has already made its first steps forward this direction. Originality/value - The smart city concept pervades contemporary urban studies, supported by European policies, according to the logic that the use of ICT could contribute to sustainable development in its various dimensions. A new-generation CP-UDP focused on e-participation may enhance safer cities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available