4.1 Article

Compound Functional Prediction Using Multiple Unrelated Morphological Profiling Assays

Journal

SLAS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 243-251

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1177/2472630317740831

Keywords

target prediction; high-content screening; mechanism of action; ensemble classifier

Funding

  1. program Investissements d'Avenir by French Government
  2. grant INCAPAIR PROSTATE program from French National Institute of Cancer [n2010-1-PRO-03]
  3. ANR [ANR-10-LABX-54, ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenotypic cell-based assays have proven to be efficient at discovering first-in-class therapeutic drugs mainly because they allow for scanning a wide spectrum of possible targets at once. However, despite compelling methodological advances, posterior identification of a compound's mechanism of action (MOA) has remained difficult and highly refractory to automated analyses. Methods such as the cell painting assay and multiplexing fluorescent dyes to reveal broadly relevant cellular components were recently suggested for MOA prediction. We demonstrated that adding fluorescent dyes to a single assay has limited impact on MOA prediction accuracy, as monitoring only the nuclei stain could reach compelling levels of accuracy. This observation suggested that multiplexed measurements are highly correlated and nuclei stain could possibly reflect the general state of the cell. We then hypothesized that combining unrelated and possibly simple cell-based assays could bring a solution that would be biologically and technically more relevant to predict a drug target than using a single assay multiplexing dyes. We show that such a combination of past screen data could rationally be reused in screening facilities to train an ensemble classifier to predict drug targets and prioritize a possibly large list of unknown compound hits at once.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available