4.0 Article

Ohio solid organ transplantation consortium criteria for liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 27, Pages 1149-1154

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i27.1149

Keywords

Alcohol-induced disorders; Alcoholic liver cirrhosis; Mortality; Survival; Liver transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM To evaluate risk of recidivism on a case-by-case basis. METHODS From our center's liver transplant program, we selected patients with alcoholic liver disease who were listed for transplant based on Ohio Solid Organ Transplantation Consortium (OSOTC) exception criteria. They were considered to have either a low or medium risk of recidivism, and had at least one or three or more months of abstinence, respectively. They were matched based on gender, age, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to controls with alcohol-induced cirrhosis from Organ Procurement and Transplant Network data. RESULTS Thirty six patients with alcoholic liver disease were approved for listing based on OSOTC exception criteria and were matched to 72 controls. Nineteen patients 53%) with a median [Inter-quartile range (IQR)] MELD score of 24 (13) received transplant and were followed for a median of 3.4 years. They were matched to 38 controls with a median (IQR) MELD score of 25 (9). At one and five years, cumulative survival rates (+/- standard error) were 90% +/- 7% and 92% +/- 5% and 73% +/- 12% and 77% +/- 8% in patients and controls, respectively (Log-rank test, P = 0.837). Four (21%) patients resumed drinking by last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION Compared to traditional criteria for assessment of risk of recidivism, a careful selection process with more flexibility to evaluate eligibility on a case-by-case basis can lead to similar survival rates after transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available