4.7 Article

REVISITING THE LYMAN CONTINUUM ESCAPE CRISIS: PREDICTIONS FOR z > 6 FROM LOCAL GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 829, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/99

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: ISM

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intrinsic escape fraction of ionizing Lyman continuum photons (f(esc)) is crucial to understanding whether galaxies are capable of reionizing the neutral hydrogen in the early universe at z > 6. Unfortunately, it is not possible to access f(esc) at z > 4 with direct observations, and the handful of measurements from low-redshift galaxies consistently find f(esc) < 10%, while at least f(esc) similar to 10% is necessary for galaxies to dominate reionization. Here, we present the first empirical prediction of f(esc) at z > 6 by combining the (sparsely populated) relation between[O III]/[O II]. and f(esc) with the redshift evolution of [O III]/[O II] as predicted from local high-z analogs selected by their H alpha equivalent width. We find f(esc) = 5.7(-3.3)(+8.3)% at z = 6 and f(esc) = 10.4(-6.3)(+15.5)% at z = 9 for galaxies with log(M/M-circle dot) similar to 9.0 (errors given as 1 sigma). However, there is a negative correlation with stellar mass and we find up to 50% larger f(esc) per 0.5 dex decrease in stellar mass. The population-averaged escape fraction increases according to f(esc) = f(esc),(0) ((1 + z) 3)(alpha), with f(esc,0) = (2.3 +/- 0.05)% and alpha = 1.17 +/- 0.02 at z > 2 for log(M/M-circle dot) similar to 9.0. With our empirical prediction of f(esc) (thus fixing an important, previously unknown variable) and further reasonable assumptions on clumping factor and the production efficiency of Lyman continuum photons, we conclude that the average population of galaxies is just capable of reionizing the universe by z similar to 6.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available