4.5 Article

Compensatory mutations improve general permissiveness to antibiotic resistance plasmids

Journal

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 1, Issue 9, Pages 1354-1363

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0243-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the NIH [P30 GM103324]
  2. University of Idaho Department of Biological Sciences undergraduate research grant
  3. NIGMS INBRE award [P20 GM103408]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 AI084918]
  5. National Science Foundation REU Site award [1460696]
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1460696] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Horizontal gene transfer mediated by broad-host-range plasmids is an important mechanism of antibiotic resistance spread. While not all bacteria maintain plasmids equally well, plasmid persistence can improve over time, yet no general evolutionary mechanisms have emerged. Our goal was to identify these mechanisms and to assess if adaptation to one plasmid affects the permissiveness to others. We experimentally evolved Pseudomonas sp. H2 containing multidrug resistance plasmid RP4, determined plasmid persistence and cost using a joint experimental-modelling approach, resequenced evolved clones, and reconstructed key mutations. Plasmid persistence improved in fewer than 600 generations because the fitness cost turned into a benefit. Improved retention of naive plasmids indicated that the host evolved towards increased plasmid permissiveness. Key chromosomal mutations affected two accessory helicases and the RNA polymerase beta-subunit. Our and other findings suggest that poor plasmid persistence can be caused by a high cost involving helicase-plasmid interactions that can be rapidly ameliorated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available