4.5 Article

Ecological resilience in lakes and the conjunction fallacy

Journal

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 1, Issue 11, Pages 1616-1624

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0333-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MARS project (Managing Aquatic ecosystems and water Resources under multiple Stress) under 7th EU Framework Programme [603378]
  2. Scottish government (RESAS) on 'Predicting the impact of current and future drivers of change upon aquatic ecology'
  3. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) PhD Studentship
  4. EU Mantel project - a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action
  5. European Joint Doctorate Innovative Training Network (EJD, ITN)
  6. CEH
  7. NERC through a National Capability programme on Ecosystem Processes Resilience
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [1512965] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a pressing need to apply stability and resilience theory to environmental management to restore degraded ecosystems effectively and to mitigate the effects of impending environmental change. Lakes represent excellent model case studies in this respect and have been used widely to demonstrate theories of ecological stability and resilience that are needed to underpin preventative management approaches. However, we argue that this approach is not yet fully developed because the pursuit of empirical evidence to underpin such theoretically grounded management continues in the absence of an objective probability framework. This has blurred the lines between intuitive logic (based on the elementary principles of probability) and extensional logic (based on assumption and belief) in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available