4.5 Article

Constrained vertebrate evolution by pleiotropic genes

Journal

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 1, Issue 11, Pages 1722-1730

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0318-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [15H05603, 22128003, 24570243, 3902, 17H06387]
  2. Platform for Dynamic Approaches to Living System from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  3. KAKENHI [16H04724]
  4. Academia Sinica
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [AS-98-CDA-L06, 102-2311-B-001-011-MY3, 104-2923-B-001-002-MY3]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J06414, 17H06385, 24570243, 3902, 22128003, 16H04724, 17H06387, 15H02416, 15H05603] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite morphological diversification of chordates over 550 million years of evolution, their shared basic anatomical pattern (or 'bodyplan') remains conserved by unknown mechanisms. The developmental hourglass model attributes this to phylum-wide conserved, constrained organogenesis stages that pattern the bodyplan (the phylotype hypothesis); however, there has been no quantitative testing of this idea with a phylum-wide comparison of species. Here, based on data from early-to-late embryonic transcriptomes collected from eight chordates, we suggest that the phylotype hypothesis would be better applied to vertebrates than chordates. Furthermore, we found that vertebrates' conserved mid-embryonic developmental programmes are intensively recruited to other developmental processes, and the degree of the recruitment positively correlates with their evolutionary conservation and essentiality for normal development. Thus, we propose that the intensively recruited genetic system during vertebrates' organogenesis period imposed constraints on its diversification through pleiotropic constraints, which ultimately led to the common anatomical pattern observed in vertebrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available