4.5 Article

Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources

Journal

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 1, Issue 11, Pages 1683-1692

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0309-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fujitsu Laboratories, Japan
  2. National Environmental Science Programme of the Australian Department of the Environment and Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decisions about natural resource management are frequently complex and vexed, often leading to public policy compromises. Discord between environmental and economic metrics creates problems in assessing trade-offs between different current or potential resource uses. Ecosystem accounts, which quantify ecosystems and their benefits for human well-being consistent with national economic accounts, provide exciting opportunities to contribute significantly to the policy process. We advanced the application of ecosystem accounts in a regional case study by explicitly and spatially linking impacts of human and natural activities on ecosystem assets and services to their associated industries. This demonstrated contributions of ecosystems beyond the traditional national accounts. Our results revealed that native forests would provide greater benefits from their ecosystem services of carbon sequestration, water yield, habitat provisioning and recreational amenity if harvesting for timber production ceased, thus allowing forests to continue growing to older ages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available