4.6 Article

Laser-emission imaging of nuclear biomarkers for high-contrast cancer screening and immunodiagnosis

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, Issue 9, Pages 724-735

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-017-0128-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1607250]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIBIB-1R21EB016783]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471254]
  4. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1607250] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detection of nuclear biomarkers, such as nucleic acids and nuclear proteins, is critical for early-stage cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Conventional methods relying on morphological assessment of cell nuclei in histopathology slides may be subjective, whereas colorimetric immunohistochemical and fluorescence-based imaging are limited by strong light absorption, broad emission bands and low contrast. Here, we describe the development and use of a scanning laser-emission-based microscope that maps lasing emissions from nuclear biomarkers in human tissues. Forty-one tissue samples from 35 patients labelled with site-specific and biomarker-specific antibody-conjugated dyes were sandwiched in a Fabry-Perot microcavity while an excitation laser beam built a laser-emission image. We observed multiple subcellular lasing emissions from cancer cell nuclei, with a threshold of tens of mu J mm(-2), submicrometre resolution (<700 nm), and a lasing band in the few-nanometre range. Different lasing thresholds of nuclei in cancer and normal tissues enabled the identification and multiplexed detection of nuclear proteomic biomarkers, with high sensitivity for early-stage cancer diagnosis. Laser-emission-based cancer screening and immunodiagnosis might find use in precision medicine and facilitate research in cell biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available