4.6 Article

Nanoplasmonic quantification of tumour-derived extracellular vesicles in plasma microsamples for diagnosis and treatment monitoring

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-016-0021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01AI113725, R01AI122932, U54CA143837, 5P50CA126752-08]
  2. NIH intramural research program
  3. John S. Dunn Foundation award
  4. PANCAN-AACR Career Development Award [14-20-25-KOAY]
  5. Radiological Society of North America seed grant [RSD1429]
  6. Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  7. Center for Radiation Oncology Research at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are of increasing interest as a resource of diagnostic biomarkers. However, most EV assays require large samples and are time-consuming, low-throughput and costly, and thus impractical for clinical use. Here, we describe a rapid, ultrasensitive and inexpensive nanoplasmon-enhanced scattering (nPES) assay that directly quantifies tumour-derived EVs from as little as 1 mu l of plasma. The assay uses the binding of antibody-conjugated gold nanospheres and nanorods to EVs captured by EV-specific antibodies on a sensor chip to produce a local plasmon effect that enhances tumour-derived EV detection sensitivity and specificity. We identified a pancreatic cancer EV biomarker, ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2), and demonstrate that an nPES assay for EphA2-EVs distinguishes pancreatic cancer patients from pancreatitis patients and healthy subjects. EphA2-EVs were also informative in staging tumour progression and in detecting early responses to neoadjuvant therapy, with better performance than a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The nPES assay can be easily refined for clinical use, and readily adapted for diagnosis and monitoring of other conditions with disease-specific EV biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available