4.1 Article

Influence of stretching velocity on musculotendinous stiffness of the hamstrings during passive straight-leg raise assessments

Journal

MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 80-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.018

Keywords

Stretch reflex; Electromyography; Portable; Range of motion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recently, passive musculotendinous stiffness (MTS) has been assessed manually in the field; however, when conducting these types of assessments, the stretching velocity must be controlled to avoid eliciting the stretch reflex, which can be observed by increased electromyographic (EMG) amplitude of the stretched muscles and greater resistive torque (indicating the assessment is no longer passive). Objective: To examine the effects of slow, medium, and fast stretching velocities during manually applied passive straight-leg raise (SLR) assessments on hamstrings MTS and EMG amplitude characteristics. Study design: Crossover study. Methods: Twenty-three healthy, young adults underwent passive, manually-applied SLR assessments performed by the primary investigator at slow, medium, and fast stretching velocities. During each SLR, MTS and EMG amplitude were determined at 4 common joint angles (0) separated by 5 during the final common 15 of range of motion for each participant. Results: The average stretching velocities were 7, 11, and 18 s-1 for the slow, medium, and fast SLRs. There were no velocity-related differences for MTS (P = 0.489) or EMG amplitude (P = 0.924). MTS increased (P < 0.001) with joint angle (01<02<03<04); however, EMG amplitude remained unchanged (P = 0.885) across the range of motion. Conclusions: Although velocity discrepancies have been identified as a potential threat to the validity of passive MTS measurements obtained with manual SLR techniques, the present findings suggest that the SLR at any of the velocities tested in our study (7-18 s(-1)) did not elicit a detectible stretch reflex, and thereby may be appropriate for examining MTS. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available