3.8 Article

Early child development inequalities and associated factors between public and private providers at metropolitan region in Chile

Journal

REVISTA CHILENA DE PEDIATRIA-CHILE
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages 351-358

Publisher

SOC CHILENA PEDIATRIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.02.008

Keywords

Child development; Risk factors; Protective factors; Inequality

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early child development is a population determinant of physical, mental and social health. To know the base line situation prior to the implementation of Chile grows with you'' (Chile Crece Contigo) is key to its evaluation. Objective: To compare early child development and associated factors at baseline in pre-school children from public and private health sectors. Patients and method: The sample consisted of 1045 children aged 30-58 months, 52% male, and 671 from the public and 380 from the private sector of the metropolitan region in Chile were evaluated using Battelle Developmental Inventory-1 and a household interview of primary carer. Results: Abnormal child development was found in 14.4% of children in the private sector compared to 30.4% in the public sector. There were no differences in adaptive area (26.3% vs 29.2%), but there were statistically significant differents in cognitive (8.8% vs 12.1%), social-personal (13.2% vs 32.5%), motor (19.2% vs 35.3%), and communication (19% vs 36.8%) development. The logistic regression showed that, independent of socioeconomic level, the risk factors are: Apgar < 7 (OR: 5.4; 95% CI: 1.24-23.84); having childhood chronic diseases (OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.11-1.42). Protective factor is: home with resources to learn and play (OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.76-0.89). Conclusion: These results are another input about early child development situation and its importance for paediatric social policy. (C) 2016 Sociedad Chilena de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available