4.8 Article

In Vitro Biocompatibility of Surface-Modified Porous Alumina Particles for HepG2 Tumor Cells: Toward Early Diagnosis and Targeted Treatment

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 7, Issue 33, Pages 18600-18608

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b05016

Keywords

nanoporous alumina particles; liver cancer; biocompatibility; in vitro; photoluminescence; functionalization

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [TEC2012-34397]
  2. Catalan Government [SGR 1344, 2013URV-LINE05]
  3. ICREA under ICREA Academia Award
  4. University Rovira i Virgili
  5. Banco Santander

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous alumina photoluminescence-inherent particles are produced and proposed for the development of biomarkers detectors and localized treatment of HepG2 cells. Nanoporous alumina particles (NPAPs) are amorphous, consist of hexagonally ordered nanometric pores in an alumina matrix, have high chemical stability in physiological pH, and exhibit a high inherent photoluminescence in the visible spectrum independently of their size, selectable from nanometers to tens of micrometers. The surface of NPAPs is chemically modified using two different functionalization methods, a multistep method with (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) and glutaraldehyde (GLTA) and a novel simplified-step method with silane-PEG-NHS. Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy analysis confirmed the proper surface modification of the particles for both functionalization methods. HepG2 cells were cultured during different times with growing concentrations of particles. The analysis of cytotoxicity and cell viability of HepG2 cells confirmed the good biocompatibility of NPAPs in all culture conditions. The results prove the suitability of NPAPs for developing new label-free biomarker detectors and advantageous carriers for localized drug delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available