4.5 Review

Islands within an island: Repeated adaptive divergence in a single population

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 653-665

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12610

Keywords

Adaptation; Aphelocoma; gene flow; morphological evolution; natural selection; population structure

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [GRFP-2006037277, DDIG-1210421]
  2. Nature Conservancy (TNC)
  3. U.S. National Park Service (NPS)
  4. Colorado State University
  5. Smithsonian Institution
  6. Queen's University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical barriers to gene flow were once viewed as prerequisites for adaptive evolutionary divergence. However, a growing body of theoretical and empirical work suggests that divergence can proceed within a single population. Here we document genetic structure and spatially replicated patterns of phenotypic divergence within a bird species endemic to 250 km(2) Santa Cruz Island, California, USA. Island scrub-jays (Aphelocoma insularis) in three separate stands of pine habitat had longer, shallower bills than jays in oak habitat, a pattern that mirrors adaptive differences between allopatric populations of the species' mainland congener. Variation in both bill measurements was heritable, and island scrub-jays mated nonrandomly with respect to bill morphology. The population was not panmictic; instead, we found a continuous pattern of isolation by distance across the east-west axis of the island, as well as a subtle genetic discontinuity across the boundary between the largest pine stand and adjacent oak habitat. The ecological factors that appear to have facilitated adaptive differentiation at such a fine scaleenvironmental heterogeneity and localized dispersalare ubiquitous in nature. These findings support recent arguments that microgeographic patterns of adaptive divergence may be more common than currently appreciated, even in mobile taxonomic groups like birds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available