4.2 Article

Effectiveness of attachment based STEEP intervention in a German high-risk sample

Journal

ATTACHMENT & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 443-460

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2016.1165265

Keywords

Attachment based early intervention; STEEP program; translational research; young high-risk mothers

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. National Center for Early Prevention (NZFH)
  3. BHF-Bank-Foundation
  4. Rotary Club International (OG-Ortenau, Bergamo-Sud, Chalon-Saint Vincent)
  5. Thomas Gottschalk Foundation
  6. Koerber Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

STEEPTM was one of the first attachment-based early intervention programs. The program applied findings from the Minnesota Longitudinal Study on Risk and Adaptation to the development of a supportive program for young high-risk mothers and their infants. STEEP's effectiveness was evaluated first in a randomized controlled study launched in 1987. The study showed effects of the one-year intervention on important individual and parenting variables, but not on quality of mother-infant attachment. In the current German study with young mothers at risk for abuse and neglect, a two-year adaptation of STEEP was evaluated within a quasi-experimental design. STEEP mother-infant pairs (N=78) were compared with pairs who received standard services of the German Child Welfare System (GCWS, N=29). Compared with GCWS pairs, significantly more mother-infant pairs in the intervention group showed secure attachment patterns in Ainsworth ' s Strange Situation when the infants were 12 months of age. At the end of the intervention (infant age=24 month), attachment security scores derived from Waters' Attachment Q-Sort were in the predicted direction and showed a medium effect size, but did not reach criteria of statistical significance. At both time points, the STEEP group showed significantly fewer signs of attachment disorganization than the comparison group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available