4.7 Article

Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours?

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 549-555

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.053

Keywords

Adolescents; Computer-mediated communication; Cross-sectional survey; Selfie; Social media; Young-adults

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Mind the Gap [1265528]
  3. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES) [440176]
  4. Academy of Finland Researcher's mobility grants [265969, 290038, 277571, 298098]
  5. Helsinki Doctoral Education Network in Information and Communications Technology (HICT) [T31300/913661]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently scholars have started examining selfie-related behaviour, with an emphasis on young women. However, little is known about age and gender differences in selfie-taking and posting patterns. To address this gap, an online survey of a sample of 3763 Norwegian social media users was carried out. This study provides the first empirical evidence on how adolescents (aged 12 to 19), young adults (20-30) and adults (31-50) differ in terms of selfie behaviour. Females were more likely to take personal and group selfies, post personal selfies, crop photos and use photographic filters compared to males. Adolescents were found to be more likely than young adults to take own and group selfies, post own selfies, and use photographic filters. Similarly, young adults were more likely to take own and group selfies, post and edit photos than older adults. The predictive effect of age was stronger among women than among men regarding selfie taking, posting and editing behaviour. The interpretations and implications of the study findings are discussed in the light of previous literature. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available