4.6 Article

Engaging a rural agricultural community in sustainability indicators and future scenario identification: case of San Luis Valley

Journal

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 79-93

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-017-0024-8

Keywords

Community engagement; Sustainability; Community advisory board; San Luis Valley; Scenarios

Funding

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a process of engagement with representative community stakeholders in a rural agricultural regionSan Luis Valley (SLV) in southern Coloradothat helped identify locally relevant future sustainability scenarios to model and analyze using sustainability indicators. Over the course of twoyears, researchers and the community advisory board identified, deliberated, and, based on their input, conceptually framed future scenarios for modelingand analysis. The suggested scenarios (for modeling) that emerged through this engagement processwere futuresolar energy development in the region, and changes to the cropping regime in the valley. SLV is a unique, geographically isolated agricultural region that has been looked at both by EPA and the state of Colorado as an ideal location for implementing sustainability measures. As a result of the present research, SLV now has the capacity to use local data to update region-specific greenhouse gas emissions and consumptive water use models. We find the community engagement process was successful both in terms of its usefulness in steering the research direction as well as its impact on community stakeholders involved in this project. Based on our experience, we recommend this community engagement approach to researchers seeking to improve the relevance and impact of region-specific sustainability analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available