4.5 Article

Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1

Keywords

EPIC; DNA methylation; HM450; Whole-genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS); Microarray; Enhancers; Validation

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1088144, 1106870]
  2. NHMRC Fellowships [1063559, 1035721, 1102752]
  3. Cancer Australia [1044458]
  4. Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - NSW
  5. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  6. Science and Industry Endowment Fund (Australia) [RP03-064]
  7. CINSW Early Career Fellowship [14/ECF/1-23]
  8. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia Movember Young Investigator Grant [YI0911]
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1102752, 1106870, 1088144] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In recent years the Illumina HumanMethylation450 (HM450) BeadChip has provided a user-friendly platform to profile DNA methylation in human samples. However, HM450 lacked coverage of distal regulatory elements. Illumina have now released the MethylationEPIC (EPIC) BeadChip, with new content specifically designed to target these regions. We have used HM450 and whole-genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) to perform a critical evaluation of the new EPIC array platform. Results: EPIC covers over 850,000 CpG sites, including >90 % of the CpGs from the HM450 and an additional 413,743 CpGs. Even though the additional probes improve the coverage of regulatory elements, including 58 % of FANTOM5 enhancers, only 7 % distal and 27 % proximal ENCODE regulatory elements are represented. Detailed comparisons of regulatory elements from EPIC and WGBS show that a single EPIC probe is not always informative for those distal regulatory elements showing variable methylation across the region. However, overall data from the EPIC array at single loci are highly reproducible across technical and biological replicates and demonstrate high correlation with HM450 and WGBS data. We show that the HM450 and EPIC arrays distinguish differentially methylated probes, but the absolute agreement depends on the threshold set for each platform. Finally, we provide an annotated list of probes whose signal could be affected by cross-hybridisation or underlying genetic variation. Conclusion: The EPIC array is a significant improvement over the HM450 array, with increased genome coverage of regulatory regions and high reproducibility and reliability, providing a valuable tool for high-throughput human methylome analyses from diverse clinical samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available